@Article{MaireMVPLBSN:2011:LeArIn,
author = "le Maire, Guerric and Marsden, Claire and Verhoef, Wouter and
Ponzoni, Flavio Jorge and Lo Seen, Danny and Begue, Agnes and
Stape, Jose-Luiz and Nouvellon, Yann",
affiliation = "CIRAD, UPR 80, Sc UMR Eco\&Sols, Persyst, F-34060 Montpellier 01,
France and CIRAD, UMR TETIS, F-34093 Montpellier 5, France and
Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci \& Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500
AE Enschede, Netherlands and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and CIRAD, UMR TETIS, F-34093 Montpellier 5,
France and CIRAD, UMR TETIS, F-34093 Montpellier 5, France and N
Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry \& Environm Sci, Raleigh, NC
27695 USA and Univ Sao Paulo, IAG, Dept Ciencias Atmosfer,
BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil",
title = "Leaf area index estimation with MODIS reflectance time series and
model inversion during full rotations of Eucalyptus plantations",
journal = "Remote Sensing of Environment",
year = "2011",
volume = "115",
number = "2",
pages = "586--599",
month = "Feb.",
keywords = "Leaf area index, Remote sensing, MOD13Q1, Radiative transfer
model, PROSAIL, GESAVI, Eucalypt, CBERS , OPTICAL-PROPERTIES,
VEGETATION INDEX, BIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCE, USE EFFICIENCY,
CANOPY, IMAGERY, FOREST, CHLOROPHYLL, RESOLUTION, GLOBULUS.",
abstract = "The leaf area index (LAI) of fast-growing Eucalyptus plantations
is highly dynamic both seasonally and interannually, and is
spatially variable depending on pedo-climatic conditions. LAI is
very important in determining the carbon and water balance of a
stand, but is difficult to measure during a complete stand
rotation and at large scales. Remote-sensing methods allowing the
retrieval of LAI time series with accuracy and precision are
therefore necessary. Here, we tested two methods for LAI
estimation from MODIS 250m resolution red and near-infrared (NIR)
reflectance time series. The first method involved the inversion
of a coupled model of leaf reflectance and transmittance
(PROSPECT4), soil reflectance (SOILSPECT) and canopy radiative
transfer (4SAIL2). Model parameters other than the LAI were either
fixed to measured constant values, or allowed to vary seasonally
and/or with stand age according to trends observed in field
measurements. The LAI was assumed to vary throughout the rotation
following a series of alternately increasing and decreasing
sigmoid curves. The parameters of each sigmoid curve that allowed
the best fit of simulated canopy reflectance to MODIS red and NIR
reflectance data were obtained by minimization techniques. The
second method was based on a linear relationship between the LAI
and values of the GEneralized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index
(GESAVI), which was calibrated using destructive LAI measurements
made at two seasons, on Eucalyptus stands of different ages and
productivity levels. The ability of each approach to reproduce
field-measured LAI values was assessed, and uncertainty on results
and parameter sensitivities were examined. Both methods offered a
good fit between measured and estimated LAI (R(2) = 0.80 and R(2)
= 0.62 for model inversion and GESAVI-based methods,
respectively), but the GESAVI-based method overestimated the LAI
at young ages.",
doi = "10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.004",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.004",
issn = "0034-4257",
language = "en",
targetfile = "galvao.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}